﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ArticleSet>
  <Article>
    <Journal>
      <PublisherName>Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</PublisherName>
      <JournalTitle>Medical Journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences</JournalTitle>
      <Issn>2783-2031</Issn>
      <Volume>29</Volume>
      <Issue>1</Issue>
      <PubDate PubStatus="ppublish">
        <Year>2007</Year>
        <Month>03</Month>
        <DAY>22</DAY>
      </PubDate>
    </Journal>
    <ArticleTitle>The Use-Effectiveness of the Combined Contraceptive Methods: Standard Days Method, Condom and Emergency Contraceptive Pills.</ArticleTitle>
    <FirstPage>83</FirstPage>
    <LastPage>87</LastPage>
    <Language>EN</Language>
    <AuthorList>
      <Author>
        <FirstName>
        </FirstName>
        <LastName>MOHAMMADPOORASL A</LastName>
      </Author>
    </AuthorList>
    <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
    <ArticleIdList>
      <ArticleId IdType="doi">
      </ArticleId>
    </ArticleIdList>
    <History>
      <PubDate PubStatus="received">
        <Year>2010</Year>
        <Month>05</Month>
        <Day>23</Day>
      </PubDate>
    </History>
    <Abstract>Background and objectives: In our country about 20% of couples are using natural methods of family planning or none of the family planning methods. The Standard Days Method is a fertility awareness-based method of family planning in which users avoid unprotected intercourse during cycle days 8 through 19. The aim of this experimental study was to determine the use-effectiveness of the combined contraceptive methods: Standard days method, condom and emergency contraceptive pills. Materials and Methods: A total of 240 women, age 17-40 years, in rural area in the west of Tabriz city, with self- reported cycles of 26-32 days, desiring to delay pregnancy at least one year were admitted to the study. After teaching the method to the subjects, they followed-up for 12 months to complete the study or excluded from study. Pearl pregnancy rate was used to determine percentage of protection of unplanned pregnancy. Results: Analysis of data indicated that 117 women didn’t get pregnant until the end of study (12 months). Only 8 women got pregnant, and a total of 1956 woman-months out of 240 women was calculated. So first-year pregnancy rate was 4.91% and percentage of protection of unplanned pregnancy was 95.09 irrespective of correct or incorrect use. Conclusion: the results show that this combined method may be an effective and acceptable method for couples.</Abstract>
  </Article>
</ArticleSet>